<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Green Equations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenequations.org/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenequations.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 02:32:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>If money mattered…………</title>
		<link>http://greenequations.org/if-money-mattered%e2%80%a6%e2%80%a6%e2%80%a6%e2%80%a6</link>
		<comments>http://greenequations.org/if-money-mattered%e2%80%a6%e2%80%a6%e2%80%a6%e2%80%a6#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 02:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What We're Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theclimatecommunity.com/?p=4706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was thinking this afternoon about the BP mess and the figures being tossed about pertaining to &#8211; clean up bill &#8211; a few billion, lost revenue in the gulf &#8211; ten&#8217;s of billions, seemingly big figures and yet &#8211; BP stock is up about 25% from its &#8220;spill&#8221; lows.  BP stock is up something [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking this afternoon about the BP mess and the figures being tossed about pertaining to &#8211; clean up bill &#8211; a few billion, lost revenue in the gulf &#8211; ten&#8217;s of billions, seemingly big figures and yet &#8211; BP stock is up about 25% from its &#8220;spill&#8221; lows.  BP stock is up something like $30billion in value over the past several weeks!  The value of BP today is about $120Billion &#8211; down from around $250Billion at it more stabilized high range.</p>
<p>So &#8211; these are big numbers &#8211; but I wondered how big are theyreally?</p>
<p>Well &#8211; lets pick four oil firms &#8211; BP, Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch Shell, and Chevron &#8211; how do they look as a group?</p>
<p>The four together have revenue of over $1 Trillion US dollars per year!  No kidding &#8211; over $1 Trillion dollars.  That is a lot of income!  In fact as a group that is more annual income then all but 11 countries in the world &#8211; and is about a tie for 12th spot with Russia.</p>
<p>Is money power?  Yes, and it is really no surprise that as an industry oil can have its way with global political leaders.  Just think &#8211; short of using bullets &#8211; the financial power of these four firms is concentrated into four men &#8211; CEO&#8217;s, who answer to boards &#8211; so maybe 40, or 50 people all together &#8211; that is amazing.</p>
<p>I do remain (generally) committed to my free-market roots, but also think it is important for citizens to consider the incentives, wealth, and persuasive power of these firms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greenequations.org/if-money-mattered%e2%80%a6%e2%80%a6%e2%80%a6%e2%80%a6/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekly Mulch: How Reid’s Energy Bill Undermines Senate Climate Efforts</title>
		<link>http://greenequations.org/weekly-mulch-how-reid%e2%80%99s-energy-bill-undermines-senate-climate-efforts</link>
		<comments>http://greenequations.org/weekly-mulch-how-reid%e2%80%99s-energy-bill-undermines-senate-climate-efforts#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 23:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah-l</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What We're Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theclimatecommunity.com/?p=4703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Sarah Laskow, Media Consortium blogger
Yesterday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) introduced a limited energy bill that responds to the oil spill and promotes energy efficiency. Reid’s action is a signal that the Senate will not pass climate legislation before November, although Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) said that a climate bill could come up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3489/3821293202_b0d1b98cdd.jpg" alt="Senator Harry Reid" width="500" height="334" /></p>
<p>by Sarah Laskow, Media Consortium blogger</p>
<p>Yesterday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) introduced a limited energy bill that responds to the oil spill and promotes energy efficiency. Reid’s action is a signal that the Senate will not pass climate legislation before November, although Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) said that a climate bill could come up in the lame-duck session following the election.</p>
<p>“The Senate’s climate bill is officially dead,” <a href="http://bit.ly/9lnRcB">Kate Sheppard writes at <em>Mother Jones</em></a>. “And given that Democrats will almost certainly hold fewer seats in Congress next year, major action on the climate is unlikely to be revived anytime soon.”</p>
<p>Since 2009, expectations for a bill regulating carbon emissions have steadily declined. After this latest failure in the Senate, the best near-term hope for addressing climate change comes from the Environmental Protection Agency, which still has the power to regulate carbon emissions.</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/90rTk2">At the Washington Independent</a>, Andrew Restuccia reports that Sen. Reid’s bill will likely hold oil companies more financially accountable for spills by lifting the cap on their liability for economic damages and will nudge homeowners towards energy efficiency.</p>
<p>But, Restuccia writes, a sources tells him that “significantly…the bill might not include a renewable energy standard.” Such a standard would require an increasing percentage of the country’s electricity to come from sources like wind and solar.</p>
<p><strong>The energy bill could create jobs<br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>Sen. Reid has often emphasized that an energy bill is also a jobs bill: Innovation in the clean energy sector creates employment opportunities at a time when they’re sorely needed. Dropping the renewable energy standard could also mean diminishing the potential for job creation.</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/cirY5U">Public News Service reports</a> that in rural areas, a standard could create thousands of jobs.</p>
<p>“The Department of Energy says, if we get to 20 percent of the nation’s electricity from wind by the year 2030”—one of the less ambitious standards proposed—“it would mean 3,000 to 4,000 new jobs in most of our states,” Chuck Hassebrook, executive director of the Center for Rural Affairs, said. “There’s not a lot of things out there bringing that kind of new economic opportunity to rural America, so it could be a great thing for us.”</p>
<p><strong>The Gulf Coast connection</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>The need for job opportunities extends beyond rural areas. In the Gulf Coast, for instance, even fishermen left idle by the oil spill are hoping the oil industry resumes drilling soon. Their communities need those jobs. <a href="http://bit.ly/aAWLHZ">As Jerome Ringo, who worked for two decades in the oil industry, writes at <em>The Progressive</em></a>, “With unemployment still in the double digits across the nation, and the people on the Gulf Coast struggling to survive, we need far more clean energy job growth than what we’re seeing right now.”</p>
<p>That’s not going to happen without a long-term commitment to clean energy from the government, Ringo argues. “Businesses need this signal to know how to invest, and, with this signal, they will move in a direction that creates many more jobs in areas like renewable energy and electric cars for people like me who once worked in oil and gas.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Climate refugees</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>That transition won’t happen overnight, but it’s important to start in that direction as soon as possible. In the United States, the effects of climate change are affecting people—farmers dealing with strange weather, for instance—but the impact is not obvious in the every day lives of Americans.</p>
<p>Not everyone has that luxury, though. LinkTV’s <a href="http://bit.ly/9mfiKs"><em>Earth Focus</em> reports</a> on the plight of climate refuges in New Guinea. In a new film, Jennifer Redfearn documents the story of the country’s Carteret Islanders—the first group to organize a community-wide evacuation of their home in the face of climate change. As the sea level rises around their island, storm surges increase and fresh water becomes salty. Carteret Islanders are looking to move to Bougainville, a neighboring island recovering from civil war.</p>
<p>“I’ve heard about you Carterets. You are an easy-going people,” one leader tells them. “Here it is totally different.”</p>
<p>The longer Americans wait to start scaling back our energy use, the more people around the globe will be displaced.</p>
<p><strong>Hydrofracking</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>When moving towards clean energy, however, it is important that leaders in Washington and on the state level watch emerging energy companies closely. For instance, <a href="http://nyti.ms/aP2Sxp"><em>The New York Times</em> reports</a> that Reid’s bill will promote natural gas production. But as natural gas grows more popular as a bridge fuel, communities and legislators are discovering more dangerous environmental impacts from the hydrofracture drilling process that companies use to extract the gas from shale deposits.</p>
<p>Josh Fox’s recent documentary, <em>Gasland</em>, showed that residents across the country in fracking areas have had their drinking water contaminated. The natural gas industry is pushing back hard against the claims his film makes. <a href="http://bit.ly/cfOFe3">Truthout reports</a> that “Energy In Depth (EID), an information service created and funded by the oil and gas industry, recently posted ‘Debunking <em>Gasland</em>,’ a point-by-point argument against the Fox’s startling discoveries. EID paints Fox as a ‘purveyor of the avant-garde’ who is guilty of ‘flat-out making stuff up.’”</p>
<p>Fox isn’t the only one to voice concerns about water quality, either. <a href="http://bit.ly/bDXYDu"><em>GritTV</em> recently heard from</a> residents in the Delaware River Basin about their concerns. “No water for gas” is their rallying cry.</p>
<p><strong>Water, water, everywhere</strong></p>
<p>Fox is fighting back, but the response to his film shows that the industry is ready to push back against any criticisms of its practices. It has also resisted effects by regulators to require disclose of the chemicals it uses in its extraction process.</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/9ynCYT">But as the Washington Independent’s Restuccia reports</a>, “Momentum is building in the House to pass new regulations on the controversial practice of hydraulic fracturing, in which water, sand and a mixture of potentially harmful chemicals are injected into the ground in order to gain access to natural gas.”</p>
<p>Unfortunately, if the fate of the climate bill is any indication, any environmental legislation, even with momentum, has little chance of moving through Congress right now.</p>
<p><em>This post features links to the best independent, progressive reporting about the environment by <a href="http://www.themediaconsortium.org/our-members/">members</a> of <a href="http://www.themediaconsortium.org/">The Media Consortium</a>. It is free to reprint. Visit <a href="http://www.themediaconsortium.org/issues/sustain/">the Mulch</a> for a complete list of articles on environmental issues, or follow us on <a href="http://www.twitter.com/mulchtmc">Twitter</a>. And for the best progressive reporting on critical economy, health care and immigration issues, check out <a href="http://www.themediaconsortium.org/issues/economy/">The Audit</a>, <a href="http://www.themediaconsortium.org/issues/healthcare">The Pulse</a>, and<a href="http://www.themediaconsortium.org/issues/immigration/"> The Diaspora</a>. This is a project of The Media Consortium, a network of leading independent media outlets.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greenequations.org/weekly-mulch-how-reid%e2%80%99s-energy-bill-undermines-senate-climate-efforts/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congratulations – Big Oil &amp; King Coal!</title>
		<link>http://greenequations.org/congratulations-%e2%80%93-big-oil-king-coal</link>
		<comments>http://greenequations.org/congratulations-%e2%80%93-big-oil-king-coal#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What We're Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theclimatecommunity.com/?p=4698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What an amazing day, month, year&#8230;.
In the midst of the biggest oil spill in our nations history, and the warmest summer on record &#8211; our leaders in Washington have finally caved in and &#8220;shelved&#8221; (killed) Cap and Trade.
Big Oil and King Coal must be thrilled!  The one serious device we could use as a nation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an amazing day, month, year&#8230;.</p>
<p>In the midst of the biggest oil spill in our nations history, and the warmest summer on record &#8211; our leaders in Washington have finally caved in and &#8220;shelved&#8221; (killed) Cap and Trade.</p>
<p>Big Oil and King Coal must be thrilled!  The one serious device we could use as a nation to curb carbon emissions has finally been put to sleep.</p>
<p>The Democratic leadership on the Hill, and the President have totally failed the environmental community.  The priorities of this Administration did not include energy, carbon, cap and trade.  What was celebrated a year and a half ago as a true changing of the guards has become a fiasco.</p>
<p>Very disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greenequations.org/congratulations-%e2%80%93-big-oil-king-coal/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate Community Citizen of the Week – Jessica Morey</title>
		<link>http://greenequations.org/climate-community-citizen-of-the-week-%e2%80%93-jessica-morey</link>
		<comments>http://greenequations.org/climate-community-citizen-of-the-week-%e2%80%93-jessica-morey#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Going Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What We're Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theclimatecommunity.com/?p=4683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congratulations to Jessica Morey this week’s Climate Community Citizen of the Week. We met Jessica with the help of a mutual friend, and were greatly impressed by her environmental resume.  Both in her efforts with Climate Lab – a climate change wiki, and her on-going work and educational background Jessica is exactly the type of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations to Jessica Morey this week’s Climate Community Citizen of the Week. We met Jessica with the help of a mutual friend, and were greatly impressed by her environmental resume.  Both in her efforts with <a href="http://climatelab.org/">Climate Lab</a> – a climate change wiki, and her on-going work and educational background Jessica is exactly the type of young person who we believe can lead us to a better environmental future.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.theclimatecommunity.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/20090522_retreat_0448.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4687" title="20090522_retreat_0448" src="http://www.theclimatecommunity.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/20090522_retreat_0448-200x300.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>The following is further background information on Jessica:</p>
<p><em>Jessica Morey is the Board Chairwoman and co-founder of Climate Lab, a non-profit dedicated to building web-based tools for knowledge sharing and collaboration that drive action to address climate change. Climate Lab launched a public climate change wiki in 2009.</em></p>
<p><em>For her day job, Jessica is the Washington, DC Project Director with the Clean Energy Group (CEG), a nonprofit organization that works with state, federal, and international organizations to promote clean energy technologies.  Ms. Morey works primarily on CEG&#8217;s International Climate Change Technology Innovation Initiative as well as assisting CEG&#8217;s Clean Energy States Alliance (CESA), a multi-state coalition of public clean energy funds working together to support clean energy technologies and markets. Jessica manages the State-Federal Partnership building project and directs CESA&#8217;s DOE Marine Energy Acceleration project. In addition, Ms. Morey acts as CEG&#8217;s liaison to the Sustainable Energy Finance Initiative (SEFI) of the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP).  She manages research on public clean energy finance mechanisms for the UNEP-SEFI Public Finance Alliance, an international consortium of publicly backed funding agencies dedicated to building sustainable energy markets.</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.theclimatecommunity.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/20090522_retreat_0462.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4688" title="20090522_retreat_0462" src="http://www.theclimatecommunity.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/20090522_retreat_0462-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a></p>
<p><em>Before joining CEG, Jessica worked as a clean energy analyst in the World Bank&#8217;s central energy unit. Her projects included mainstreaming low carbon analysis into Bank energy projects and improving coordination and knowledge sharing across the Bank&#8217;s energy practice and international development partners. She has also consulted with the Natural Resources Defense Council on the Carbon Neutral Costa Rica campaign and worked as the International Fellow at the Pew Center for Global Climate Change.  She received her Bachelors in Environmental Engineering from Dartmouth College, a Masters in International Affairs from American University and a Masters in Sustainable Development from the UN University for Peace in Costa Rica. Jessica&#8217;s other interests include practicing and teaching yoga and insight meditation- particularly with teenagers.</em></p>
<p>Congratulations again to Jessica and keep up the great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greenequations.org/climate-community-citizen-of-the-week-%e2%80%93-jessica-morey/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Cap and Trade?</title>
		<link>http://greenequations.org/what-is-cap-and-trade</link>
		<comments>http://greenequations.org/what-is-cap-and-trade#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What We're Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theclimatecommunity.com/?p=4679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is a short description of &#8220;Cap and Trade&#8221; that can be found on the US EPA web site.  In addition to being a nice explanation of Cap and Trade, the site reminds us that there are several very successful Cap and Trade programs in place, which have worked well at reducing specific types [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following is a short description of &#8220;Cap and Trade&#8221; that can be found on the <a href="http://www.epa.gov/">US EPA</a> web site.  In addition to being a nice explanation of Cap and Trade, the site reminds us that there are several very successful Cap and Trade programs in place, which have worked well at reducing specific types of pollutants.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theclimatecommunity.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/epa1.jpg" rel="lightbox[4679]"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4680" title="epa[1]" src="http://www.theclimatecommunity.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/epa1.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>Please take the time to look&#8230;&#8230;<a href="http://www.epa.gov/capandtrade/">Cap and Trade &#8211; US EPA</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greenequations.org/what-is-cap-and-trade/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
